Entertainment Software Association v. Swanson
(formerly ESA v. Hatch)
 443 F. Supp. 2d 1065 (D. Minn. 2006)

Summary: This case is a challenge to a Minnesota video game ban.

Documents:

1. Minnesota Senate Bill 785
2. June 6, 2006 complaint
3. U.S. District Judge James Rosenbaum's decision granting permanent injunction
4. Minnesota's reply brief
5. Amicus brief submitted to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals by members of the Media Coalition
6. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion
7. State of Minnesota's Petition to Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to have Rehearing En Banc
8. Plaintiffs' response to petition for rehearing en banc
 

History:

On May 31, 2006, Governor Pawlenty signed Senate Bill 785 into law.  The law would have restricted the sale or rental of games rated "M" or "AO" by the ESRB to anyone under 17 and -- in contrast to other state video games bans -- would have imposed a $25 fine on any minor purchasing or renting a restricted game.  It would have also required retailers to post signs explaining the restriction. 

On June 6, the Entertainment Software Association, joined by the Entertainment Merchants Association, filed a complain in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis.  The court heard oral argument on July 11, 2006 and Judge Rosenbaum permanently enjoined the law on July 31, 2006.  In his decision, the judge wrote, "There is a paucity of evidence linking the availability of video games with any harm to Minnesota's children at all."  The court also found it unconstitutional to delegate power to the ESRB's private rating system and found that the signage requirement was compelled speech.

On October 27, Minnesota submitted its reply brief in its appeal of the district court's preliminary injunction to the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals.  On November 29, Media Coalition members submitted an amicus brief.  The brief argued that video games, even those with violent content, are protected by the First Amendment.  Additionally, the brief argued that First Amendment-protected materials may not be restricted based on an emotional or psychological impact.  In addressing the ratings system enforcement provision of the Minnesota law, the brief argued that the state may not delegate legislative power to a private ratings system, and, even if it could, the definitions in the ESRB's ratings system are unconstitutionally vague. 

On November 29, 2006,  Media Coalition members submitted an amicus brief highlighting the constitutional deficiencies of a Minnesota video game ban that was previously enjoined by the District Court and has been appealed to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.  The brief argued that video games, even those with violent content, are protected by the First Amendment.  The brief also argued the law improperly delegates power to a private rating system. 

Oral argument was heard February 12, 2007 before Judges Wollman, Smith, and Benton of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.  On March 17, 2008, the judges ruled that the lower court's decision will stand.  The state of Minnesota filed a petition for rehearing en banc on March 28.

This page was last updated March 28, 2008.